GEORGE DEMING, APPELLANT,
v.
WHYI, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a party's failure to appear at trial, despite receiving notice, can lead to a harsh but natural consequence of judgment against them.
Appellant was a defendant in an action by a radio station for advertising services. Appellant's counsel withdrew, and notice was directed to appellant…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Notice Of Trial cases and more on FLexlaw
GLICKSTEIN, Judge.
This is a timely appeal from a final judgment and subsequent order denying motion to vacate final judgment. We affirm.
Appellant was one of several defendants in this action brought by a radio station to recover for radio advertising services it had performed. The amended complaint alleged that appellant and others, individually and as agents for a disclosed principal, agreed to pay for the services. Prior to trial appellant’s counsel was allowed to withdraw. The record reflects that the order permitting withdrawal required that all further pleadings and notices be directed to appellant at a specific address.
Several months later plaintiff moved to set the non-jury trial. The order setting the cause for trial shows that a copy of the motion and order were furnished to appellant. Appellant does not represent that he did not receive the notice of trial, but according to his brief he did not appear at trial. Judgment was entered against him, another individual, and the disclosed principal.
Shortly after entry of the judgment newly obtained counsel unsuccessfully sought the trial court’s consideration of appellant’s position. On appeal appellant argues that the “record" clearly shows he did not contract individually with the radio station, and points to the answer to interrogatories and his deposition in support thereof.
To deny appellant relief is a harsh result, but a natural consequence of his failure to appear at trial. Holt Industries, Inc. v. Airtronies International Corp., 139 So. 2d 731 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962); see Vines v. Vines, 357 So. 2d 243, 246 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). In the absence of any evidence that the nonappearance was caused by non-receipt of notice, we feel compelled to affirm.
AFFIRMED.
MOORE and BERANEK, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Vines v. Doyle Eugene Vines, 357 So. 2d 243 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978)
- Holt Indus., Inc. v. Airtronics Int'l Corp., 139 So. 2d 731 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)