DOLPHIN TOWERS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION NOT FOR A PROFIT, APPELLANT,
v.
DONALD J. DEL BENE AND VIRGINIA DEL BENE, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that a condominium association becomes the prevailing party entitled to attorney fees under Florida's Condominium Act when a unit owner voluntarily dismisses their action against the association, even if the owner subsequently files an identical suit.
The court held that a defendant against whom an action is voluntarily dismissed is the prevailing party under Section 718.303(1) and is therefore entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees. The association's entitlement to attorney fees is not affected by the fact that the unit owners subsequently filed an identical suit.
[1] A condominium association is the prevailing party entitled to attorney fees under Section 718.303, Florida Statutes, when a unit owner voluntarily dismisses their action…
[2] A voluntary dismissal of an action by a plaintiff makes the defendant the prevailing party for the purpose of awarding attorney fees.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“the prevailing party is entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees”
The statutory language from Section 718.303(1), Florida Statutes (1979), establishing the basis for the prevailing party attorney fees provision in the Condominium Act.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceThe Del Benes, owners of a condominium unit in Dolphin Towers, sought declaratory relief and a mandatory injunction to require the association to remo…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Mandatory Injunction cases and more on FLexlaw
HOBSON, Acting Chief Judge.
The issue of this appeal is whether, on voluntary dismissal of a unit owner’s action against a condominium association, the condominium association becomes the prevailing party for purposes of an award of attorney fees under Section 718.303, Florida Statutes (1979). We answer in the affirmative, and reverse the circuit court’s order denying the condominium association/defendant’s motion for attorney fees.
Appellees, the Del Benes, are owners of a condominium unit in the Dolphin Towers Condominium. Appellant is the condominium association. Appellees sought declaratory relief and a mandatory injunction re quiring the association to remove a redwood trellis and six trees from the recreational area of the condominium. The condominium association raised the affirmative defense of failure to join as an indispensable party the owner of the improvements that the Del Benes wished removed. It also counterclaimed for a reasonable attorney fee in the event that it was determined to be the prevailing party. The case proceeded to nonjury trial, which was continued because of insufficient time to complete the presentation of evidence. Subsequently the Del Benes voluntarily dismissed the action pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.420(a)(1). The condominium association moved for an award of attorney fees as the prevailing party under Section 718.303(1). Following a hearing, the lower court denied the motion. The following day, the Del Benes filed a new action against the condominium association, which was the same as the first action except that the owners of the improvements were joined as party defendants.
Section 718.303(1), Florida Statutes (1979), provides that in an action by or against a condominium association, “the prevailing party is entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees.” The condominium association, defendant in the lower court, contends that when the Del Benes voluntarily dismissed their action, the association became the “prevailing party” within the meaning of Section 718.303(1) and was therefore entitled to an award of attorney fees. We agree.
Although there has been no judicial interpretation of the term “prevailing party” as used in Section 718.303(1), Florida courts have construed Section 713.29, Florida Statutes (1979), an analogous provision in the Mechanics’ Lien Statute. That section provides in pertinent part:
In any action brought to enforce a lien, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover a reasonable fee for the services of his attorney
All courts which have construed the above section under facts similar to the instant case have held that where a mechanics’ lien claim is voluntarily dismissed, the party against whom the claim was brought is the “prevailing party” and is entitled to recover attorney fees. Gordon v. Warren Heating & Air Conditioning, 340 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Marden Kitchen Cabinets, Inc. v. Bruns, 312 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Jackson v. Hatch, 288 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974); Lion Oil Company, Inc. v. Tamarac Lakes, Inc., 232 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970). We hold that the term “prevailing party” in Section 718.303(1) of the Condominium Act should likewise be construed to include a defendant against whom a voluntary dismissal is taken.
Further, the fact that the Del Benes filed a new suit stating the same cause of action does not affect the condominium association’s entitlement to attorney fees. The association incurred attorney fees in asserting what proved to be a meritorious affirmative defense, in preparing for trial, and in participation in a trial before the Del Benes voluntarily dismissed the suit. We believe that the legislature must have had this situation in mind, as well as those in which a defendant might prevail on the merits, when it provided for the allowance of attorney fees to the prevailing party.
Accordingly, the order appealed is reversed and the cause remanded for the purpose of holding a hearing directed to the award of attorney fees to the condominium association.
GRIMES and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (16 total)
-
Stuart Plaza, Ltd. v. Atl. Coast Dev. Corp. OF Martin Cnty., 493 So. 2d 1136 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)…ntary dismissal the defendant is the prevailing party. Gordon v. Warren Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc., 340 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); McKelvey v. Kismet, Inc., 430 So. 2d 919 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Dolphin Towers Condominium Ass’n v. Del Bene, 388 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). Next, we hold that after a voluntary dismissal by plaintiff the trial court does have jurisdiction to award attorney’s fees where the fees are authorized by statute or a contract between the parties. Hatch v. Dance, 464 So. 2d…
-
51 Island WAY Condo. Ass'n, Inc. v. Williams, 458 So. 2d 364 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984)…3d DCA 1982).1 After entry of a voluntary dismissal, attorney’s fees can be awarded to the so-called prevailing party under statutory provision where the case was not resolved on the merits. Dolphin Towers Condominium Association, Inc. v. Del Bene, 388 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); MacBain v. Bowling, 374 So. 2d 75 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979); Gordon v. Warren Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc., 340 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976); Mardan Kitchen Cabinets, Inc. v. Bruns, 312 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Jackson v. H…
-
Alhambra Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Adnan Asad, 943 So. 2d 316 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006)…824 So. 2d 1026, 1029 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002) (contractual provision); Rushing v. Caribbean Food Prods., 870 So. 2d 953 (Fla. 1st DCA 2004) (lease provision). Factually, the closest case to this one is Dolphin Towers Condominium Ass’n, Inc. v. Del Bene, 388 So. 2d 1268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). There, a unit owner sued a condominium association seeking to compel the association to remove a trellis and trees from a recreation area of the condominium. The association raised the affirmative defense of failure to join the o…
Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Ronald Jackson and Joanne v. Jackson, 288 So. 2d 564 (Fla. 2d DCA 1974)
- Mardan Kitchen Cabinets, Inc. v. Bruns, 312 So. 2d 769 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975)
- Gordon v. Warren Heating & AIR Conditioning, Inc., 340 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)
- Press v. Press, 340 So. 2d 1234 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976)
- Lion OIL Co., Inc. v. Tamarac Lakes, Inc., 232 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970)