OHIO CASUALTY GROUP, APPELLANT,
v.
JAMES C. PARRISH, JR., APPELLEE
OHIO CASUALTY GROUP, APPELLANT,
JAMES C. PARRISH, JR., APPELLEE
389 So. 2d 679
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 16 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We review the trial court’s $276,250 attorneys fee award.
Previously, we remanded to the trial court for rendition of the fee judgment now appealed, and that order has been affirmed. Ohio Casualty Group v. Parrish, 338 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), aff’d 350 So. 2d 466 (Fla.1977).
We hold that the trial court properly awarded fees in the instant ease, and that, based on our review of testimony and other evidence adduced below, the award was not so excessive as to constitute an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court. Thus, we affirm.
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (16 total)
-
Kruse v. State, 483 So. 2d 1383 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)…ejected scientific or expert determinations of credibility. Knight v. State, 97 So. 2d 115, 119 (Fla.1957); Goldstein v. State, 447 So. 2d 903, 905 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); Rodriguez v. State, 413 So. 2d 1303, 1305 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Holliday v. State, 389 So. 2d 679, 680 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). We caution trial courts to be careful that such opinions are not put before juries, including the one that may be impaneled to try this case again. Notwithstanding our disagreement with appellant as to the admission of test…
-
Lazarowicz v. State, 561 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…d for the state was permitted to testify as to prior consistent statements made by Jennifer. These witnesses’ hearsay testimony improperly corroborated Jennifer’s trial testimony. See Van Gallon v. State, 50 So. 2d 882 (Fla.1951); Holliday v. State, 389 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Allison v. State, 162 So. 2d 922 (Fla. 1st DCA 1964). The trial judge gave various reasons for admitting evidence of Jennifer’s prior consistent statements. See State v. Palmore, 510 So. 2d 1152 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (evidence inad…
-
Carroll v. State, 497 So. 2d 253 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)…ll established rule in Florida is that a witness’ trial testimony may not be corroborated by his own prior consistent statement. Van Gallon v. State, 50 So. 2d 882 (Fla.1951); McElveen v. State, 415 So. 2d 746 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Holliday v. State, 389 So. 2d 679 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Perez v. State, 371 So. 2d 714 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979); Lamb v. State, 357 So. 2d 437 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Brown v. State, 344 So. 2d 641 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977); Roti v. State, 334 So. 2d 146 (Fla. 2d DCA 1976); Kellam v. Thomas, 287 So. 2…
Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- The Ohio Cas. Grp. v. Parrish, 350 So. 2d 466 (Fla. 1977)
- The Ohio Cas. Grp. v. Parrish, 338 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)