WILLIAM A. RIDDLE, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence entered by the Circuit Court of Orange County, Florida. The Public Defender has filed an Anders
motion and brief requesting leave to withdraw as counsel for appellant and representing to this court that no reversible error appears. On April 24, 1980, this court gave the appellant thirty (30) days within which to file a brief in his own behalf. No such brief has been filed. The court has reviewed counsel’s brief and the record herein and no reversible error appears. The motion of the Public Defender to withdraw is hereby granted and the judgment and sentence is hereby
AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH, C. J., and COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur. . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (11 total)
-
Baker v. State, 425 So. 2d 36 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)…es cited in note 8 therein. . Yet, amazingly, in Hegstrom it is said “But we see nothing in Blockburger which bars multiple convictions for lesser included offenses.” Hegstrom v. State, 401 So. 2d 1343, 1346 (Fla.1981). . But see Chapman v. State, 389 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), holding that the constitutional right against double jeopardy is waived by failure to raise the question by motion to dismiss. See also Jeffers v. United States, 432 U.S. 137, 151-2, 97 S.Ct. 2207, 2216, 53 L.Ed.2d 168 (1977). T…
-
Torrence v. State, 440 So. 2d 392 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)…e been equated to the court rules that merely implemented them and violations denied judicial redress on the basis of waiver implied from failure to comply with other procedural rules requiring contemporaneous objection. See, e.g., Chapman v. State, 389 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). A right is worth no more than the value of the remedy provided for its breach. A right is impaired and destroyed by impairing or destroying its remedy or by implying waivers of its breach. Violations of individual constitutional…
-
Johnson v. State, 460 So. 2d 954 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)…itute a fundamental error but is subject to the contemporaneous objection rule. See Garcia v. State, 444 So. 2d 969 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Drakes v. State, 400 So. 2d 487 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), review denied, 411 So. 2d 381 (Fla.1981); Chapman v. State, 389 So. 2d 1065 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). These cases were based on the authority of cases decided in two other district courts of appeal.5 However this court has also held to the contrary by treating the violation of double jeopardy rights as fundamental error and gran…1 / 4
Previewing 3 of 11 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)