GUY K. STEWART, APPELLANT,

v.

JANICE B. STEWART, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Stolzenberg v. Forte Towers S., Inc., 430 So. 2d 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …usal is unsupported by the record and is contradicted by the exclusive use provisions contained in the lease. Once Forte Towers surrendered possession and control of the premises, it was no longer liable for injuries to third persons, Colon v. Lara, 389 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), as a matter of law. See Friedman v. Virginia Metal Products Corp., 56 So. 2d 515 (1952). Appellant maintains that her affidavit raised issues of fact as to whether Forte Towers fully surrendered possession to Mada’n. In the aff…
• Grier v. Bankers Land Co. & The Shaker Corp., Inc., 539 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
  …section at a speed in excess of forty-five miles per hour. Thus, no real or genuine factual issue existed. It is at best a so-called “paper” issue and a party may not forestall a summary final judgment by raising purely paper issues. Colon v. Lara, 389 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Soper v. Stine, 184 So. 2d 892 (Fla. 2d DCA 1966). Accordingly, summary final judgment was an appropriate disposition. There is another aspect of this case that is somewhat troubling and mention of it is included only because it…
• Siegel v. Deerwood Place Corp., 701 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
  …g, the defendants argued that not only did they not have notice of the alleged dangerous condition, but also that the plaintiffs had failed to allege and demonstrate “fraud and concealment” on the part of the defendants as required by Colon v. Lara, 389 So. 2d 1070 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The trial court granted summary judgment citing to Colon in its order. The plaintiffs’ appeal follows. The Siegels contend that the trial court erred by granting summary judgment based on the authority of Colon. Although we agre…

Authorities Cited

• Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)
• Shaw v. Shaw, 334 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1976)
• Burton Ginsberg v. Ginsberg, 113 So. 2d 565 (Fla. 3d DCA 1959)
• S. Am. Fire Ins. Co. v. Schwartzman, 192 So. 2d 77 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966)