HARRY E. JORDAN, D/B/A INLAND SERVICE STATION AND AMERICAN STATES INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANTS,
v.
EDWARD EUGENE SMITH, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Florida appellate court reversed a workers' compensation award that improperly combined a lump sum for disfigurement (a scheduled injury) with permanent partial disability based on loss of wage earning capacity, holding that only the greater of the two calculation methods may be awarded.
A deputy commissioner errs in awarding both a lump sum for disfigurement (a scheduled injury) and permanent partial disability based on loss of wage earning capacity, as only the greater of the two statutory calculation methods may be awarded.
[1] In calculating permanent partial disability benefits under Florida law, a deputy commissioner must award whichever is greater: loss of wage earning capacity or the total…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceJordan, an employer, appealed a workers' compensation award to Smith for a 50% permanent partial disability based on loss of wage earning capacity and…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Disfigurement cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Jordan, the employer in a Workers’ Compensation action, appeals a deputy commissioner’s order which awarded Smith a fifty percent (50%) permanent partial disability based on loss of wage earning capacity and also awarded a $2,000.00 lump sum for disfigurement. Jordan urges two points on appeal: Whether the deputy erred in awarding a lump sum for disfigurement in addition to an award of permanent partial disability; and whether the record contained competent, substantial evidence to sustain the finding of fifty percent (50%) disability. Smith cross appeals, arguing the deputy erred in failing to find permanent total disability. We reverse on appellant’s first point.
In calculating permanent partial disability benefits, a deputy should award whichever of these two factors is greater: 1) loss of wage earning capacity, or 2) the total of scheduled injuries, plus injury to the body as whole not resulting from the scheduled injuries. Section 440.15, Florida Statutes. See Eques v. Best Knit Textile Corporation et al., 382 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). Serious disfigurement is an injury scheduled under Section 440.15(3)(t), Florida Statutes. Therefore, the deputy erroneously added an award for a scheduled injury to an award based upon loss of wage earning capacity.
We affirm on Jordan’s second point on appeal, and on Smith’s cross appeal.
Accordingly, the order below is reversed and remanded to the deputy commissioner for proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.
MILLS, C. J., and McCORD and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Berta Eques v. Best Knit Textile Corp. & Hartford Ins. Grp., 382 So. 2d 736 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980)