JUANITA MOSES JORDAN, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE,
v.
HARVEY MERLE JORDAN, APPELLEE AND CROSS-APPELLANT

Fla. 1st DCA | 1980-11-17
No. UU-7
MILLS, C. J., and McCORD, J., concur.
389 So. 2d 1258 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1980) Negative Treatment
Cited by 12 cases
Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON, Judge.

THOMPSON, Judge.

This is an appeal and cross-appeal from a Final Judgment which dissolved appellant’s marriage with the appellee.

Upon consideration of the briefs and the record, we find that the trial court should have explicitly incorporated the provisions of the pre-dissolution Agreement into the Final Judgment. Additionally, the Final Judgment should have resolved the remaining issues set forth in paragraph 11 of the Agreement.

In respect to the cross-appeal, if the trial court should determine that the husband is to be responsible for the wife’s future medical expenses, the court should determine his maximum liability in this regard. See Peteler v. Peteler, 145 So. 2d 291, 292 (Fla.3d DCA 1962).

Accordingly, the Judgment is reversed and this cause is remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

MILLS, C. J., and McCORD, J., concur.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Miller v. Miller, 466 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
    …dical and dental costs not covered by insurance and regardless of amount, is error since one extended illness could wipe him out financially. We agree and remand to the trial court to determine his maximum liability in this regard. Jordan v. Jordan, 389 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). See generally, Thompson v. Thompson, 325 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED and REMANDED in part. ORFINGER and SHARP, JJ., concur.…
  • Richards v. Richards, 477 So. 2d 620 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)
    …dical and dental costs not covered by insurance and regardless of amount, is error since one extended illness could wipe him out financially. We agree and remand to the trial court to determine his maximum liability in this regard. Jordan v. Jordan, 389 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). See generally, Thompson v. Thompson, 325 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 4th DCA 1976). Id. at 357. In accordance with our decision in Miller, we remand to the trial court to determine the husband’s maximum liability in regard to medical…
  • Marsh v. Marsh, 553 So. 2d 366 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989)
    …39 So. 2d 1178 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Holtan v. Holtan, 528 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Angle v. Angle, 506 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); rev. denied, 513 So. 2d 1060 (Fla.1987); Black v. Black, 490 So. 2d 1334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986); Jordan v. Jordan, 389 So. 2d 1258 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Peteler v. Peteler, 145 So. 2d 291 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962). Contra, Brandenburg v. Brandenburg, 550 So. 2d 565 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989); Thompson v. Thompson, 325 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). .Certainly in this day and time everyone s…

Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw