EUGENE CIPOLLONI, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
HENRIETTA LEWIS, APPELLEE
EUGENE CIPOLLONI, MAYOR OF THE CITY OF LAUDERHILL, FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
HENRIETTA LEWIS, APPELLEE
390 So. 2d 133
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 10 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant failed to demonstrate reversible error, and therefore the cause is affirmed and remanded to the trial court with instructions to enter a final judgment for appellee, the amount of which should reflect a set-off of all monies earned by appellee from the date of termination through January 31, 1980. In the event the parties are unable to stipulate to the amount of the set-off, the trial court is instructed to conduct an evidentiary hearing for that purpose.
DOWNEY, HERSEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Cunningham v. Anchor Hocking Corp., 558 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)…orney, agent, or employee and to divulge names and addresses of any person having relevant information as well as to indicate generally the type of information held by the person listed, [emphasis added] See Florida Power & Light Co. v. Limeburner, 390 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). The rule is stated in Dade County School Board v. Soler, 534 So. 2d 884, 885 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), as follows: Although a party may be ordered to provide the names and addresses of individuals who have furnished statements in ant…
-
Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Varsenig Nakutis, 435 So. 2d 307 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983)…y material should be disclosed. Petitioner says incident reports prepared by a party in anticipation of litigation are work product of the party and its attorneys. Vann v. State, 85 So. 2d 133 (Fla.1956); Florida Power & Light Company v. Lineburner, 390 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Fogarty v. Brothers Transfer Company v. Perkins, 250 So. 2d 655 (Fla.2d DCA 1971); Grand Union v. Patrick, 247 So. 2d 474, 475 (Fla.3d DCA 1971); Sligar v. Tucker, 267 So. 2d 54 (Fla. 4th DCA 1972). Rule 1.280(b)(2), Florida Ru…
-
Fed. Express Corp. v. Cantway, 778 So. 2d 1052 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…rule. See Karch v. MacKay, 453 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984); New Life Acres, Inc. v. Strickland, 436 So. 2d 391 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Nakutis, 435 So. 2d 307, 308 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Fla. Power & Light Co. v. Limeburner, 390 So. 2d 133 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Such reports need not be ordered by an attorney in order to be considered work product, see Snyder v. Value Rent-A-Car, 736 So. 2d 780 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), and they can constitute work product even if they are prepared before a…
Previewing 3 of 10 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence