SCOTT CORWIN, TONI CORWIN, TIM FITZGERALD AND PAM SIMS, APPELLANTS,

v.

NORMAN FINK, MARIA FINK, AND SX INDUSTRIES, INC., A MASSACHUSETTS CORPORATION, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Judges OF the Dist. Court OF Appeal, 405 So. 2d 980 (Fla. 1981)
  …to review on Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.331(c),3 which governs rehearings en banc. It then reversed Rogers as being in [*982] direct conflict with one of the court’s later decisions.4 Rogers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 390 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). State Farm filed a petition for common law certiorari with this Court seeking to vacate the en banc court’s November 12th judgment because it lacked jurisdiction. We have treated the petition as an application for writ of manda…
• Dart v. State, 417 So. 2d 1165 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982)
  …The Motion for Belated Rehearing/Motion to Recall Mandate filed more than fifteen (15) days from the date of the issuance of the decision in this cause is stricken as untimely. Fla.R.App.P. 9.330(a); Rogers v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co., 390 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980). However, upon its own motion, the Court has deter [*1166] mined to reconsider its earlier decision, 415 So. 2d 846, rendered in this cause and has withdrawn the mandate. The State has now filed with this Court the information…
• Clark v. Florida, 475 U.S. 1134 (U.S. 1986)
  …App. to Juris. Statement A-4. Appellant responded by citing a Florida District Court of Appeal decision from 1980 supporting his position that the court could consider his rehearing motion. See Rogers v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 390 So. 2d 138 (Fla. App. 1980). He also asserted that the State’s motion for fees “demonstrate[d] a shocking degree of arrogance and lack of professionalism,” App. to Juris. Statement A-7, and that the State, “by its motion, reveals that it has nothing but contem…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Canell v. Arcola Hous. Corp., 65 So. 2d 849 (Fla. 1953)