STEVEN BURKE, APPELLANT,
v.
DADE COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA AND ARTHUR JOSEPH TAURIAC, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLEES

Fla. 3d DCA | 1980-12-02
No. 80-338
Before BARKDULL, HENDRY and BASKIN, JJ.
390 So. 2d 797 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1980) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s refusal to instruct the jury regarding a statute not brought into issue by the evidence: Testimony established that the vehicle in question was stopped for traffic, rather than for the pedestrian (plaintiff). But see § 316.-130, Fla.Stat. (1977).

We similarly affirm the court’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for directed verdict. See Stresscon International, Inc. v. Helms, 390 So. 2d 139 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …parties and issues that were fully litigated and determined in another forum) with St. Louis Baptist Temple, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., 605 F. 2d 1169 (10th Cir.1979) (collateral estoppel an aspect of res judicata) and Vera v. Garcia, 390 So. 2d 797 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (subsequent action barred where no new issue), and American National Bank & Trust Co. of Fort Lauderdale v. Egidi, 388 So. 2d 51 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (under doctrine of estoppel by judgment, parties are estopped from litigating iss…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw