PAN AMERICAN TITLE SERVICES, INC., APPELLANT,

v.

TRUST COMPANY BANK, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Houser v. State, 474 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 1985)
  …evidence on behalf of criminal defendants.” 104 S.Ct. at 2533. A blood or breath sample has no inherent evidential value. The evidence at trial is not the sample but, rather, the results of tests performed on the sample. Trombetta; State v. Cooper, 391 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). The due process question thus is whether the accused has sufficient opportunity to question the results of the tests. There is no indication in this case that the state failed to refrigerate the sample in bad faith. The defendant…
• State v. Castellano, 407 So. 2d 273 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …PER CURIAM. Reversed. U. S. v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 96 S.Ct. 2392, 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); State v. Sobel, 363 So. 2d 324 (Fla.1978); State v. Brown, 393 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); State v. Cooper, 391 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).…
• Emilio Rodriguez v. State, 416 So. 2d 866 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …and because his lawyer’s own unequivocal objection to the offending comment was incorrectly overruled. Simpson v. State (Fla. Case no. 49,681, opinion filed, April 8, 1982). The other points raised by the defendant have no merit. State v. Cooper, 391 So. 2d 332, 333 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); United States v. Ross,-U.S.-, 102 S.Ct. 2157, 72 L.Ed.2d 572 (1982). Reversed.…

Authorities Cited

• Coyle v. PAN Am. Bank OF Miami, 377 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
• The United States v. Sommer Corp., 580 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1978)