VERDELL HILL, JR., APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 5th DCA | 1980-12-17
No. 79-298
COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur.
391 So. 2d 346 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1980) Negative Treatment
Cited by 52 cases
Opinion of the Court
FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., Judge.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence entered by the Circuit Court for Putnam County. The Public Defender has filed an Anders1 motion and brief requesting leave to withdraw as counsel for appellant and representing to this court that no reversible error appears. On April 17,1980, the Fifth District Court of Appeal gave appellant thirty (30) days within which to file a brief in his own behalf. No such brief has been filed. The court has reviewed counsel’s brief and the record herein and no reversible error appears. The motion of the Public Defender to withdraw is hereby granted and the judgment and sentence is hereby AFFIRMED.

COBB and SHARP, JJ., concur. . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (27 total)

  • Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003)
    …814 So. 2d 322, 328 (Fla.) (“[T]here is no constitutional right for hybrid representation at trial.”), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 123 S.Ct. 603, 154 L.Ed.2d 526 (2002). Thus, as the Fifth District Court of Appeal succinctly stated in Sheppard v. State, 391 So. 2d 346 [*475] (Fla. 5th DCA 1980),2 shortly after this Court decided Tait, “[t]he defendant, under appropriate circumstances, has the constitutional right to waive counsel and represent himself. The defendant has no right, however, to partially represent h…
  • McCRAY v. State, 71 So. 3d 848 (Fla. 2011)
    …ropriate circumstances, has the constitutional right to waive counsel and represent himself. The defendant has no right, however, to partially represent himself and, at the same time, be partially represented by counsel.” (quoting Sheppard v. State, 391 So. 2d 346, 347 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980))). Accordingly, the trial court did not in err in failing to conduct a Faretta inquiry. 2. McCRAY’s Request During the State’s Opening Next, McCRAY contends that the trial court conducted a constitutionally infirm Faretta…
  • Ault v. State, 53 So. 3d 175 (Fla. 2010)
    …rcumstances, has the constitutional right to waive counsel and represent himself. The defendant has no right, however, to partially represent himself and, at the same time, be partially represented by counsel.” Id. at 475 (quoting Sheppard v. State, 391 So. 2d 346, 347 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)). With the exception of a defendant’s pro se motion to discharge his or her court-appointed attorney, any pro se pleading that is not adopted by the defendant’s counsel is unauthorized and a nullity. See id. at 475-76; but s…

Previewing 3 of 27 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw