STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
RICHARD DALE MARTINS, APPELLEE; STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, V. RICHARD THOMAS SCHMIDT, APPELLEE

Fla. 4th DCA | 1980-12-31
Nos. 79-2448, 80-88
ANSTEAD, MOORE and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
391 So. 2d 781 Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1980) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on the authority of Mulryan v. Judge, Division “C”, 350 So. 2d 784 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) and State ex rel. Wright v. Yawn, 320 So. 2d 880 (Fla. 1st DCA 1975).

ANSTEAD, MOORE and HURLEY, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • State v. Hutley, 474 So. 2d 233 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
    …key question is thus whether the continuance of January 9 was attributable to the defense and not excused. The trial court said that continuance was not a waiver of the speedy trial period, citing the three cases we now summarize. State v. Martins, 391 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), is unhelpful because it is a brief per curiam affirmance citing the authority of the two other cases. In Mulryan v. Judge, Division “C” Circuit Court of Okaloosa County, 350 So. 2d 784 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), the information agains…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw