DONALD A. WARBRITTON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal of a judgment and sentence entered by the Circuit Court for Orange County, Florida. The public defender has filed an Anders
motion and brief, requesting leave to withdraw as counsel for appellant and representing to this court that no reversible error appears. On June 26,1980, this court gave the appellant thirty (30) days within which to file a brief in his own behalf. No such brief has been filed. The court has reviewed the brief and the record herein and no reversible error appears. The motion of the public defender to withdraw is hereby granted, and the judgment and sentence are hereby affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
COBB, SHARP and COWART, JJ., concur. . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Nardone v. State, 798 So. 2d 870 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001)…not be used to inflame the minds and passions of jurors so that their verdict reflects an emotional response to the crime or the defendant rather than the logical analysis of the evidence in light of the applicable law.”); see also Spriggs v. State, 392 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)(re-buking and admonishing prosecutor for picking up knife admitted into evidence and sticking it into jury rail but finding harmless error because of defendant’s own bizarre conduct and overwhelming evi [*875] dence against him);…
-
Robinson v. State, 610 So. 2d 1288 (Fla. 1992)…s which may reasonably be drawn from the evidence.” Bertolotti v. State, 476 So. 2d 130, 134 (Fla.1985). Closing argument, however, “must not be used to inflame the minds and passions of the jurors.” Id. This case is a far cry from Spriggs v. State, 392 So. 2d 9 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), in which the district court admonished a prosecuting attorney for sticking a knife used in an armed robbery into the rail of the jury box during closing argument. Here, the knives did not become a feature of closing argument, an…
-
Ayalavillamizar v. State, 134 So. 3d 492 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014)…r’s demonstration, standing alone, was so egregious as to warrant a new trial). In this case, although the prosecutor’s conduct in closing argument was improper, it was not so egregious, standing alone, to warrant a new trial. See Spriggs v. State, 392 So. 2d 9, 10 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980) (admonishing prosecutor for picking up knife admitted into evidence and sticking it into jury rail during closing argument, but finding the error harmless); Clark v. State, 553 So. 2d 240, 242 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989) (finding that…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)