EDWARD L. GOODPASTER, APPELLANT,

v.

NANCYE S. GOODPASTER, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Jackson v. Fla. Dep't OF Corr., 790 So. 2d 381 (Fla. 2001)
  …e toward the costs of their lawsuits and ultimately pay for the lawsuits in full if they subsequently become able to do so. See § 57.085(5), Fla.Stat. (1999).2 We reaffirm that proposition today. See generally Kleinschmidt v. Estate of Kleinschmidt, 392 So. 2d 66 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Lee v. City of Winter Haven, 386 So. 2d 268 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); Hillman v. Federal Nat'l Mortgage Ass’n, 375 So. 2d 336, 337 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979). We again applaud the efforts of the Legislature in this regard and intend to fully…
• Chappell v. Fla. Dep't of Health & Rehabilitative Servs., 419 So. 2d 1051 (Fla. 1982)
  …provision includes appellate courts. Fields v. Zinman, 394 So. 2d 1133, 1139 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) (Hurley, J., concurring); Nichols v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 393 So. 2d 13 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980); Kleinschmidt v. Estate of Kleinschmidt, 392 So. 2d 66 (Fla.3d DCA 1981). [*1053] The district court was also correct in saying that in an appellate proceeding, it is the lower tribunal, and not the lower tribunal’s clerk, that has the responsibility of granting a certificate of indigency. The procedure…
• Ludlow v. Brinker, 403 So. 2d 969 (Fla. 1981)
  …980). . Id. at 1001. . Id. at 1002. . This phrase was recently deleted. See Ch. 80-348, § 1, Laws of Fla. One court has opined that the purpose of the deletion was to broaden the scope of the provision. See Kleinschmidt v. Estate of Kleinschmidt, 392 So. 2d 66, 67 (Fla.3d DCA 1981), where the court said: We perceive that one of the purposes of the recent amendment was to authorize the right [*971] to appellate review by an indigent person. The term “proceeding,” used in the amended statute, is more encom…

Authorities Cited

• Shannon v. State, 335 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 1976)