ALAN D. VETTERICK AND NANCY VETTERICK, APPELLANTS,
v.
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., A NEW YORK CORPORATION, APPELLEE
ALAN D. VETTERICK AND NANCY VETTERICK, APPELLANTS,
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO., A NEW YORK CORPORATION, APPELLEE
392 So. 2d 306
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1980)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. Whitten v. Miami Dade Water & Sewer Authority, 357 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Wilson v. Florida Processing Company, 368 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Fickle v. Adkins, 394 So. 2d 461 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)…ce in response to a court’s suggestion or, a fortiori, a party’s acquiescence to the court’s portent.2 Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. Payne, 358 So. 2d 541 (Fla.1978); Walter E. Heller & Company, Southeast v. Pointe Sanibel Development Corporation, 392 So. 2d 306 (Fla.3d DCA 1980); Arnold v. Arnold, 292 So. 2d 384 (Fla.3d DCA 1974). Reversed and remanded. . All parties to this appeal seek reversal of this order in whole or in part. The law firm of Sinclair, Louis, Siegel & Heath is a party to this appea…
-
Resorts Int'l, Inc. v. Charter AIR Ctr., Inc., 503 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)…names interchangeably at trial and that evidence was introduced which demonstrated that both companies were owned by the same person cannot establish Charter’s allegation by implication. Cf. Walter E. Heller & Co., S.E. v. Pointe Sanibel Dev. Corp., 392 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (interchangeably using two corporate names during trial did not prove nonparty’s right to recover by implication). Charter should have been precluded from raising this issue at trial. Cf. Griffin v. Griffin, 463 So. 2d 569 (Fla. 1…
-
U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n for J.P. Morgan Mortg. Acquisition Corp. 2005-WMC1 v. Rios, 166 So. 3d 202 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015)…Giasi never responded to indicate her acceptance or agreement to the terms outlined in Mr. Sanoba’s e-mail of September 23, 2013. A stipulation cannot be effected by silence or acquiescence. Walter E. Heller & Co., Se. v. Pointe Sanibel Dev. Corp., 392 So. 2d 306, 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980). Based on the foregoing analysis, we conclude that U.S. Bank was not precluded from opposing Coffin’s motion to set aside the foreclosure sale. We now turn to the question of whether Coffin established any valid grounds that…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Berriel v. State, 368 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)
- Broda v. The City OF Miami, 357 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Whitten v. Miami-Dade Water & Sewer Auth., 357 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)