UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GUARANTY CO., APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT HAROLD BRYANT, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
USF&G's workers' compensation lien was valid even though recorded after judgment entry but before satisfaction, as the statute does not require pre-judgment recording.
A workers' compensation carrier's notice of lien constitutes a valid lien upon a judgment when recorded after judgment entry but before satisfaction, not requiring advance recording.
[1] A workers' compensation carrier's notice of lien upon a judgment for third-party tort recovery constitutes a valid lien when recorded after judgment entry but before sati…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceUSF&G, a workers' compensation carrier, filed notice of compensation and medical benefits paid to an injured worker in the worker's third-party tort s…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Worker'S Compensation Lien cases and more on FLexlaw
ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., Judge.
At issue on USF&G’s appeal is whether Section 440.39(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1977), since amended, Chapter 79-40, Section 30, Florida Laws, required that the carrier’s notice of compensation and medical benefits paid be recorded in advance of the judgment, as well as previously filed in the worker’s lawsuit against the third party tortfeasor, in order to constitute a lien for equitable distribution of benefits paid. The circuit court held that USF&G’s notice was timely filed, but not timely recorded before entry of judgment, and so denied USF&G’s claim of lien. Section 440.39(3)(a) provided in relevant part:
Upon suit being filed, the employer or the insurance carrier, as the case may be, may file in the suit a notice of payment of compensation and medical benefits to the employee or his dependents, which said notice shall be recorded and the same shall constitute a lien upon any judgment recovered to the extent that the court may determine to be their pro rata share for compensation benefits paid or to be paid. ..
USF&G recorded its notice and claim of lien after the worker’s judgment was entered but before it was satisfied. That, we think, was sufficient to establish a lien under the statute. No sound reason has been advanced, and no authority has been cited, including Cook Motor Co. v. Vaughn, 189 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966), Alfar Creamery Co. v. Williams, 366 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 4th DCA 1979), and Kight v. Capeletti Bros., 384 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980), which requires a more restrictive interpretation.
REVERSED.
THOMPSON, J., and WOODIE A. LILES, (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Cook Motor Co. v. Vaughn, 189 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 1st DCA 1966)
- Alfar Creamery Co. & U. S. Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Williams, 366 So. 2d 458 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978)
- Luddy Gene Kight and Sandra M. Kight v. Capeletti Bros., 384 So. 2d 1302 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980)