WILLIAM EDWARD VAN POYCK, A/K/A WILLIAM EDWARD F. VAN POYCK, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIAM EDWARD VAN POYCK, A/K/A WILLIAM EDWARD F. VAN POYCK, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
392 So. 2d 609
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Petitioner pursuant to Fla.R.App.P. 9.140(g) having taken this appeal from the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief under Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850, and this court having considered the record presented and having further determined that it conclusively appears therefrom that petitioner is entitled to no relief, the denial of his motion is affirmed. Gonzalez v. State, 367 So. 2d 1008, 1011 (Fla.1979).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dane D. Morgan v. Kelly, 642 So. 2d 1117 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…516 So. 2d 337, 338 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)). See R.K. Cooper Constr. Co. v. Fulton, 216 So. 2d 11 (Fla.1968); Liberty Business Credit Corp. v. Schaffer/Dunadry, 589 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Flagship State Bank of Jacksonville v. Drew Equip. Co., 392 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Here, the trial court erred in using an incorrect formula to determine the deficiency, resulting in a judgment [*1118] for less than the full amount of the debt. See Mizner Bank v. Adib, 588 So. 2d 825 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). A tr…
-
Cmty. Bank OF Homestead v. Valois, 570 So. 2d 300 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…curs. . Savers Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Sandcastle Beach Joint Venture, 498 So. 2d 519, 522 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986) (“The date of the foreclosure sale is the date at which the fair market value is determined."); Flagship State Bank v. Drew Equip. Co., 392 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981) (same); Symon v. Charleston Capital Corp., 242 So. 2d 765 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970) (same). . The record refutes the bank’s contention that the appraisal opinion was not admissible because the appraisal was not as of the date of the f…1 / 3
-
Fed. Deposit Ins. Corporation/liquidator of the Bank of Lake Helen v. Circle BAR Ranch, Inc., 450 So. 2d 921 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984)…sale, the mere difference between the foreclosure sale price and the “market value” of the property does not justify denial of a deficiency judgment for the balance of all sums due. See Flagship State Bank of Jacksonville v. Drew Equipment Company, 392 So. 2d 609 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). REVERSED and REMANDED. DAUKSCH, FRANK D. UPCHURCH and COWART, JJ., concur.…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Brown v. State, 367 So. 2d 1008 (Fla. 1979)