THE FLORIDA BAR, PETITIONER,
v.
DAVID H. SINGER, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1981-01-08
No. 59790
SUNDBERG, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.
392 So. 2d 901 Florida Supreme Court (1981) Positive Treatment
Cited by 32 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This matter is before the Court on Petition for Approval of Conditional Guilty Plea to violations of Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(5), and (6) of the Code of Professional Responsibility of The Florida Bar. We approve the Petition and hereby reprimand Respondent, David H. Singer, for these violations. The publication of this order in Southern Reporter shall serve as Respondent’s public reprimand.

Costs in the amount of $50.00 are hereby taxed against the Respondent.

It is so ordered.

SUNDBERG, C. J., and ADKINS, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and McDONALD, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (16 total)

  • Hart v. Hart, 458 So. 2d 815 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984)
    …es of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections.” Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314, 70 S.Ct. 652, 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950); Quay Development, Inc. v. Elegante Building Corporation, 392 So. 2d 901, 903 (Fla.1981). Thus, the general rule is that a court cannot determine “matters not noticed for hearing and not the subject of appropriate pleadings.” Fickle v. Adkins, 394 So. 2d 461, 462 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). See also Connolly v. Connolly, 448 So…
  • Hernandez v. Deputy Ward, 437 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
    …ement of due process is notice reasonably calculated under the circumstances and an opportunity to be heard. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust, 339 U.S. 306, 70 S.Ct. 652, 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950); Quay Development, Inc. v. Elegante Building Corp., 392 So. 2d 901 (Fla.1981); Millstream Corp. v. Dade Cty., 340 So. 2d 1276 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977). Parties in a civil matter are not always entitled to a hearing; rather, they must be given an opportunity to be heard, eg., by appropriate motions and memoran-da. Boddie…
  • Highsmith v. Dep't of Prof'l Reg., 499 So. 2d 19 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)
    …uirement of due process in any proceeding which is to be accorded finality “is notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency” of an action. Quay Development, Inc. v. Elegante Building Corp., 392 So. 2d 901, 903 (Fla.1981). Indeed, Section 120.57(2)(a), Florida Statutes, expressly requires that an agency provide affected persons with “reasonable notice” of proposed or completed agency action and afford them a meaningful opportunity to present written o…

Previewing 3 of 16 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw