STATE OF FLORIDA EX REL. JOHN C. SMITH
v.
WALTER R. CLARK, SHERIFF OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA

Fla. | 1948-01-30
TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, BUFORD and SE-. BRING, JJ., concur.
160 Fla. 113 Florida Supreme Court (1948)
Also reported at: 33 So. 2d 721

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

A Florida court upheld the extradition of John C. Smith to Iowa to face charges of breaking and entering the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks lodge in Cedar Rapids. Smith contested the extradition by claiming he was not in Iowa at the time of the alleged crime, but the court found sufficient evidence of his presence and participation to uphold the extradition order.


Holding

The court affirmed the extradition order, finding that the evidence established the appellant's presence in Iowa at the time of the alleged crime and his participation in the break-in, thereby satisfying the legal requirements for extradition.


Key Quotes

“the building in question was entered on the night of April 26, 1947, and money taken therefrom; that the appellant was seen about the building a few hours before it was entered; he had agreed with others to enter the building and take the money”

Evidence establishing Smith's presence and participation in the alleged crime sufficient for extradition

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

Smith was taken into custody in Broward County, Florida under an extradition warrant issued by Florida's Governor at Iowa's request. Iowa charged Smit…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
CHAPMAN, J.:

CHAPMAN, J.:

The appellant, John C. Smith, was taken into custody and held by the officers of Broward County, Florida, under a warrant issued by Honorable Millard F. Caldwell, Governor of Florida, upon the demand of the Governor of the State of Iowa. The information lodged with the Governor of Florida by the Governor of Iowa charged that John C. Smith, on the 26th day of April, 1947, with two others, did break and enter the building of the Benevolent and Protective Order of Elks, located in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, with the intent to commit the crime of larceny.

The appellant, by petition filed in the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida, contended that he was á fugitive from justice, nor was he within the State of Iowa during the month of April, 1947, and that the various legal steps required by applicable statutes and controlling decisions authorizing his extradition on the charge preferred had not been taken or observed by the States of Iowa and Florida. The return to the writ as made by the Sheriff of Broward County *114joined issue on the allegations of the appellant’s petition to the effect that “he was not within the State of Iowa in the month of April, 1947, the time represented by the police officers” as the time of the commission of the alleged crime , or at any other time thereafter to the present date and that petitioner was not within the State of Iowa at any time during the year, 1947.

On the issues made a hearing was held in the court below, when the parties appeared and were heard by counsel; testimony adduced and arguments made, after which the trial court entered an order quashing the writ previously issued and remanded John C. Smith to the custody of the Sheriff of Broward County, Florida, with directions that he be delivered to an agent of the State of Iowa to be returned to Cedar Rapids, Iowa, to stand trial on the crime of larceny. On June 13, 1947, an order was entered allowing, an appeal by the. petitioner to the Supreme Court of Florida.

Counsel for appellant pose here six questions for adjudication, each of which have been studied and the cited authorities examined. It is our conclusion that the controlling question presented by the record is whether or not the appellant was in the State of Iowa on the evening of April 26th and the morning of April 27th, 1947. The evidence in the record discloses that the building in question was entered on the night of April 26, 1947, and money taken therefrom; that the appellant was seen about the building a few hours before it was entered; he had agreed with others to enter the building and take the money; some of his confederates assisted in having a skeleton key made with which to unlock the door. The record fails to establish the petitioner’s presence in the State of Iowa after the entry of the building. We fail to find error in the record. See Sections 941.01 to 941.37, F.S.A.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, BUFORD and SE-. BRING, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw