JUDITH HERSKOWITZ AND ROBERT HERSKOWITZ, APPELLANTS,
v.
MARVIN J. HERSKOWITZ, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1981-01-27
No. 79-1185
Before HUBBART, C. J., and SCHWARTZ and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
393 So. 2d 45 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1981) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. § 744.312(1), Fla.Stat. (1979); Fla.R.P. & G.P. 5.120(a); 3 Fla.Jur.2d “Appellate Review” §§ 313, 359 (1978); see McDermott v. Thompson, 29 Fla. 299, 10 So. 584 (1892); In re Estate of Verdier, 281 So. 2d 543, 546 (Fla. 2d DCA); cert. denied, 287 So. 2d 97 (Fla.1973).


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • R.A. Jones & Sons, Inc. v. Holman, 470 So. 2d 60 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
    …evidence relating to lost profits may, of course, be considered in respect to Jones’ claim against H & M. . Mulford (despite its quashal), along with Roe and Twyman, were cited by this court in Agricultural Alumni Seed Improvement Ass'n v. Jackson, 393 So. 2d 45 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). . There was testimony that crop losses occurred because the irrigation system, needed to protect the crop from freeze damage, shut down during the freeze. .This rule protects the plaintiff "against any uncertainty encountered i…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw