THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT,

v.

MIGUEL PITA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Zisook v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 440 So. 2d 452 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …, Zisook sought a declaratory judgment that his uninsured motor vehicle limits were actually $100,-000/$300,000. A final summary judgment in favor of Zisook was reversed by this [*453] court. See State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Zisook, 393 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). At trial, Zisook contended that he had orally requested the higher limits but that, evidently, the State Farm agent’s secretary had mistakenly indicated on the written application the lower limits. The State Farm agent testified…
• Robinson v. State, 400 So. 2d 172 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …claimed merely that the weapon was not shown to be a firearm, V.J.T. v. State, 390 So. 2d 1212 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); Daley v. State, 374 So. 2d 59 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), and (b) the evidence of concealment was, in any event, sufficient, Oliver v. State, 393 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Affirmed.…
• Yambo v. Gen. Am. Life Ins. Co., 400 So. 2d 770 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …ntended by both parties, though at different stages of the proceedings, there are genuine issues of law and material fact which preclude entry of summary judgment. Holl v. Talcott, 191 So. 2d 40 (Fla.1966); State Farm Mutual Insurance Co. v. Zisook, 393 So. 2d 1191 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Perez, II v. City of Miami, 358 So. 2d 1132 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978); Villa v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., 354 So. 2d 122 (Fla.3d DCA 1978); Reflex, N. V. v. The UMET Trust, 336 So. 2d 473 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). Reversed and remand…

Authorities Cited

• Walker v. State, 355 So. 2d 202 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)