ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,

v.

RALPH DIPADOVA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. del Gaudio, 445 So. 2d 605 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …which gratuitously discuss willfulness or the lack thereof where there is no prejudice to the defendant which arises from the discovery violation, and there is no issue concerning a sanction to be imposed against counsel. See, e.g., State v. Brown, 393 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Miller v. State, 435 So. 2d 258; State v. King, 372 So. 2d 1126. Since it is enough to say that where there is no prejudice to the defendant, there can be no dismissal, exclusion of evidence, mistrial, etc., further discussion of…
• State v. Maritsa Saldarriaga, 486 So. 2d 683 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)
  …of the charges and discharge of the defendant is not an appropriate sanction. See Antone v. State, 410 So. 2d 157 (Fla.1982); Marshall v. State, 413 So. 2d 872 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), quashed on other grounds, 455 So. 2d 355 (Fla.1984); State v. Brown, 393 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). The court may consider less drastic remedies. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings. HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ., concur.…
• State v. Castellano, 407 So. 2d 273 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …PER CURIAM. Reversed. U. S. v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97, 96 S.Ct. 2392, 49 L.Ed.2d 342 (1976); State v. Sobel, 363 So. 2d 324 (Fla.1978); State v. Brown, 393 So. 2d 1195 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); State v. Cooper, 391 So. 2d 332 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).…

Authorities Cited

• Berkshire Mut. Ins. Co. v. Moffett, 378 F.2d 1007 (5th Cir. 1967)
• Worcester Mut. Fire Ins. Co. & Sec. Mut. Liab. Ins. Co. v. Eisenberg, 147 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 3d DCA 1962)
• N.Y. Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Diaks, 69 So. 2d 786 (Fla. 1954)