W. THOMAS GRIMM, APPELLANT,
v.
SUSAN H. GRIMM, APPELLEE
W. THOMAS GRIMM, APPELLANT,
SUSAN H. GRIMM, APPELLEE
394 So. 2d 536
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment granting a petition for modification of child support. The wife filed the petition for modification and after a contested hearing, the Circuit Court eventually increased child support from $50 per week to $62.50 per week. We have considered the briefs of the parties and the record and conclude that appellant has failed to demonstrate reversible error. The judgment awarding additional child support is therefore affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
ANSTEAD, BERANEK and HERSEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sprunger v. Sprunger, 534 So. 2d 925 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988)…v. Brown, 484 So. 2d 1282 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). See also section 743.07(2), Florida Statutes (specifically authorizes courts to order parental support for adult dependent children); Smith v. Smith, 495 So. 2d 886 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Sudduth v. Scott, 394 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). John also contends that a dependency determination, and support based thereon, is not a proper subject to be heard in a dissolution proceeding. It has been well established in case law since the passage of section 743.07(2), Flo…
-
State v. Harnois, 609 So. 2d 149 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)…for processing under URESA. The judge in this URESA proceeding denied the petition because the father had legal custody of the children. A petitioner is not required to have legal custody in order to institute a URESA proceeding. Sudduth v. Scott, 394 So. 2d 536 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981) (grandmother, who had actual custody of depen [*150] dent with the parents’ knowledge and consent, had standing to petition for support under URESA). See also Saask v. Yandell, 702 P. 2d 1327 (Alaska 1985) (stepfather, who had ac…