RICHARD PAUL LAIRD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Affirmed conviction for escape under Fla. Stat. § 944.40, but the court noted the five-year sentence was harsh given the defendant's compassionate circumstances of leaving to visit his dying mother.
A conviction for escape is affirmed where sufficient evidence supports guilt and the sentence is within statutory limits, despite the defendant's sympathetic circumstances.
[1] A trial court's sentence for escape, though within statutory limits, may warrant appellate comment regarding its harshness relative to the defendant's circumstances, even…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“Justice should be tempered with mercy and understanding. They appear to have been overlooked in this case.”
The court's closing observation about the harshness of the sentence given Laird's compassionate motivation.
Laird was serving a 475-day burglary sentence at a minimum-security facility scheduled for release in three months when he learned his 80-year-old mot…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Escape From Custody cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Laird was found guilty of “escape” in violation of section 944.40, Florida Statutes (1979), and the trial judge sentenced him to five years imprisonment. “Escape” is a second degree felony, for which a court may sentence a defendant to imprisonment for up to 15 years.1
Laird had been serving a 475 day sentence for burglary at the Orange County Court Alternative Center, and he was scheduled for release on June 27, 1979, approximately three months after his escape. He was notified that his eighty year old mother, who was living in Ohio, had suffered an accident and was not expected to live. Laird asked for a furlough to see his mother, but his request was denied. While on a weekend furlough within Orange County, Laird telephoned to check his mother’s progress and was told her condition was failing. He hitchhiked to Ohio, but his mother died before he arrived. Laird turned himself in to police in Ohio four months later. We are powerless to reverse or amend this judgment because there was sufficient evidence to uphold Laird’s conviction, no error occurred in jury instructions, and the sentence imposed was within the legal limits. McInnes v. State, 345 So. 2d 781 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977). However, the harshness of the sentence, under the circumstances, deserves comment. Justice should be tempered with mercy and understanding. They appear to have been overlooked in this case.
AFFIRMED.
FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., and SHARP, JJ., concur. COBB, J., concurs specially with opinion.
. § 775.082(3)(c), Fla.Stat. (1979).
COBB, Judge,
concurring specially.
I concur in the result reached by the majority, but decline to join in the comment regarding the sentence. The severity of the sentence is not an issue on appeal, and this court has not been furnished a record or briefs in that regard. There well may be factors properly known to the trial court which are unknown to us. Therefore, consideration of the sentence, other than its legality, is not the appropriate province of this court.