QUAIL HOLLOW INVESTMENTS, INC., APPELLANT,

v.

THE LOMAS & NETTLETON COMPANY, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Trees v. K-Mart Corp., 467 So. 2d 401 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985)
  …dering Ms. Trees’ proffered testimony that she had not suffered any ill effects from the first arrest. The determination of relevancy is within the discretion of the trial court. Ferradas v. State, 434 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Nelson v. State, 395 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). Where a trial court has weighed probative value against prejudicial impact before reaching its decision to admit or exclude evidence, an appellate court will not overturn that decision absent a clear abuse of discretion. Brown v…
• Hierro v. State, 608 So. 2d 912 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992)
  …s reversed and remanded with directions to enter a judgment of acquittal on that count. The remaining convictions are reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial. . In our view the other case principally relied on by the State, Nelson v. State, 395 So. 2d 176, 178 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), has been limited by Lawhorne. . § 843.02, Fla.Stat. (1991). . The question whether the theft and possession of burglary tools convictions were intended to run consecutively or concurrently is moot in view of the reversal…
• Agrofollajes, S.A. v. E.I. DU Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc., 48 So. 3d 976 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010)
  …the trial court erred when it permitted the introduction of [*992] prior claims testimony as evidence. The determination of relevancy is within the discretion of the trial court. Ferradas v. State, 434 So. 2d 24 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983); Nelson v. State, 395 So. 2d 176 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). The Fourth District Court of Appeal held in Trees v. K-Mart Corp., 467 So. 2d 401, 403 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), that “[wjhere a trial court has weighed probative value against prejudicial impact before reaching its decision to admit…