ELTON H. SCHWARZ, APPELLANT,
v.
ROSE MARIE SCHWARZ, APPELLEE
ELTON H. SCHWARZ, APPELLANT,
ROSE MARIE SCHWARZ, APPELLEE
395 So. 2d 607
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This appeal contests an order of the trial court entered after a hearing on the appel-lee’s motion for contempt for appellant’s failure to pay support. The trial court found the appellant in arrears, but refused to hold him in contempt. In lieu thereof, final judgment was entered for the arrear-age.
The trial court’s order arrives here with a presumption of correctness. Since the appellant has failed to provide us with a transcript of the hearing, and we are advised that none exists, we are compelled to indulge the presumption and affirm.
AFFIRMED.
MOORE, HERSEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Elton H. Schwarz v. Honorable Tom Waddell, Jr., 422 So. 2d 61 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982)…] Issue two lacks merit on its face since the amounts due under the continuing writ of garnishment pertain only to the amounts accruing subsequent to the final judgment entered on September 21,1978. The appeal of that judgment in Schwarz v. Schwarz, 395 So. 2d 607 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), could in no way affect the jurisdiction of the lower court to determine arrearages accruing subsequent to September 21st. Last and foremost, relator urges us to apply the law of contempt to the law of garnishment. Contempt does…