GORDON G. EDMONDSON, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Reversible Error cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence finding appellant guilty of violating his probation and modifying such probation. The Public Defender has filed an Anders1 motion and brief requesting leave to withdraw as counsel for appellant and representing to this court that no reversible error appears. On September 18, 1980, this court gave appellant thirty (30) days within which to file a brief in his own behalf. Appellant filed a brief statement in his defense. The court has reviewed counsel’s brief and the record herein and no reversible error appears. The motion of the Public Defender to withdraw is hereby granted and the judgment and sentence is hereby AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH, C. J., and FRANK D. UP-CHURCH, Jr. and COWART, JJ., concur. . Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In the Interest of W.E.B., III v. State, 553 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)…ructed that the reckless driving must also have been willful and wanton, since “[t]he adjectives ‘reckless’ or ‘willful and wanton’ by themselves are not significant because they are often used interchangeably.” [Footnote omitted.] Rushton v. State, 395 So. 2d 610, 612 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Rather, “[t]heir significance is found in the phrases which they modify and in the acts which they proscribe.” Id. (emphasis in original.)3 Hence, according to Rushton, the [*326] conduct proscribed by the vehicular homicid…
-
Williams v. City OF Minneola, 619 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993)…of jury instructions or statutory construction, the terms reckless or willful or wanton conduct have no significant difference because they are used interchangeably. See W.E.B. v. State, 553 So. 2d 323, 325-326 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Rushton v. State, 395 So. 2d 610, 612-613 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). See generally Black’s Law Dictionary (5th ed. 1979) (defining the terms recklessness, wanton, wanton act, and willful or wanton conduct). Moreover, the courts of this state have recognized that a cause of action for in…
-
State v. DEL RIO, 854 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003)…caused by the operation of a motor vehicle by another in a reckless manner likely to cause the death of, or great bodily harm to, another. § 782.071, Fla. Stat. (2000); see also W.E.B. v. State, 553 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Rushton v. State, 395 So. 2d 610, 612 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Section 782.071 has remained substantially unchanged since it first entered Florida law in 1975. See ch. 74-383, § 16, Laws of Fla. Vehicular homicide cannot be proven without also proving the elements of reckless driving.…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)