MICHAEL O'DAY, APPELLANT,
v.
TAYLOR RENTAL CENTER; LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A workers' compensation claimant who suffered sudden back pain while lifting equipment appealed the Deputy Commissioner's denial of benefits. The court held that the claimant's testimony of sudden sharp pain during work constituted competent evidence of an accident under Florida's workers' compensation law, reversing the dismissal.
The claimant's testimony that he experienced a sudden sharp pain while lifting equipment and subsequently required bed rest constitutes competent substantial evidence of an unexpected or unusual event happening suddenly, thereby qualifying as an accident under Florida's workers' compensation law.
[1] An accident, for workers' compensation purposes, is defined as an unexpected or unusual event or result happening suddenly.
[2] A claimant's testimony of experiencing sudden sharp pain while lifting equipment, resulting in the need for bed rest and hospitalization, constitutes competent substantia…
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“an unexpected or unusual event or result happening suddenly”
The statutory definition of accident under Florida Statutes Section 440.02(18) that must be met to qualify for workers' compensation benefits
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceMichael O'Day, a 20-year-old employee of Taylor Rental Center with a prior history of back problems, was hired in October 1979 to assist customers wit…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Worker'S Compensation Claim cases and more on FLexlaw
SHAW, Judge.
The claimant, a 20-year-old male with a medical history of back difficulties, was employed by the present employer in October of 1979 to assist customers in equipment rentals. On Friday, November 23, at approximately 3:00 p. m., he was in the process of moving a generator when he experienced a sudden sharp pain in the center of his back. After abandoning efforts to move the generator he spent the remainder of the day loading chairs and the next day was unable to work because of pain. Saturday and Sunday were spent in bed and on Monday he was seen by Dr. DiCosola who opined that he had suffered a new injury to his back.
The Deputy Commissioner denied the appellant’s claim for compensation and dismissed the claim with prejudice. The following paragraph from the order sheds light upon the dismissal:
6. Section 440.02(18), Florida Statutes, defines “accident” as being merely “an unexpected or unusual event or result happening suddenly. ... ” (emphasis added). Therefore, in order to find an accident in this instance, it is necessary to find an unusual or unexpected result did, in fact, happen suddenly. Predicated upon the bizarre symptomatology pattern and the employee-claimant’s previous experiences of similar import which are set forth in the findings of fact hereinabove, it is the finding of your undersigned that the employee has not sustained an acci dent and injury arising out of and in the course of his employment as that term is so defined in the statutory provision afore recited. Therefore, and after careful review of all of the evidence presented for my consideration, it is the opinion of your undersigned that there is no competent nor substantial evidence to meet the employee-claimant’s burden of proof of establishing that he did, in fact, sustain an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment on November 23, 1979, during the claimant’s employment with the employer herein.
The Deputy’s finding is not supported by the record. The claimant’s testimony that he experienced a sudden sharp pain while lifting equipment, and that as a result of the pain he required bed rest and hospitalization is competent substantial evidence of an unexpected or unusual event or result happening suddenly. The episode qualifies as an accident within the meaning of the Workers’ Compensation Law. Gray v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co., 64 So. 2d 650 (Fla.1953).
The order is accordingly reversed and the cause is remanded to the Deputy for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
SHIVERS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Brasington Cadillac-Oldsmobile & Claims Ctr. v. Martin, 641 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…l connection between the employment and the injury or condition at issue. Harris v. Josephs of Greater Miami, Inc., 122 So. 2d 561 (Fla.1960); Munroe Memorial Hosp. v. Thompson, 388 So. 2d 1338 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). Cf. O’Day v. Taylor Rental Center, 395 So. 2d 1194 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981) (claimant’s lay testimony relating onset of sharp back pain to lifting incident at work was competent substantial evidence of an unusual event or result constituting an “accident” for statutory purposes, and the record included a…
Authorities Cited
- Gray v. Emp'rs Mut. Liab. Ins. Co., 64 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 1952)