CHARLES MORRIS, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Collins v. State, 438 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)
  …ticipation with criminal intent, and mere presence at the scene, including driving the perpetrator to and from the scene or a display of questionable behavior after the fact, is not sufficient to establish participation. Interest of R.W.G. v. State, 395 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Pack v. State, 381 So. 2d 1199 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980); G.C. v. State, 407 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). Where two or more inferences in regard to the existence of criminal intent and criminal acts must be drawn from the evidence an…
• G. C. v. State, 407 So. 2d 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …ome word which was intended to and which did incite cause, encourage, assist or induce another person to- actually commit the crime. Ryals v. State, 112 Fla. 4, 150 So. 132 (1933); J.L.B. v. State, 396 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); R.W.G. v. State, 395 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Chaudoin v. State, 362 So. 2d 398 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978). The state implores that the necessary elements of intent and act may be inferred — because G.C. knew that Delgado was going to commit a crime and was present during Delgado’…
• T.J.T. v. State, 460 So. 2d 508 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …petrator to or from the scene of the crime. . E.g., Collins v. State, 438 So. 2d 1036 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983); Miller v. State, 420 So. 2d 631 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); G.C. v. State, supra; J.L.B. v. State, 396 So. 2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); R.W.G. v. State, 395 So. 2d 1279 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). . We note that proof of the stealthful entry into the curtilage of a building has been found sufficient to constitute the offense of burglary of a structure located on the premises. Tobler v. State, 371 So. 2d 1043 (Fla. 1st DCA…