RAQUEL QUESADA, APPELLANT,

v.

ERNESTO QUESADA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Robinson, 565 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990)
  …purposes. It prevents violence and physical injury to both the police and the occupants of the home. It protects the occupants’ private activities from unexpected exposure. It minimizes property damage resulting from forced entry. State v. Manning, 396 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 407 So. 2d 1104 (Fla.1981). In this case, those purposes are only modestly affected. There is no indication of physical injury, violence, or property damage in this case. If anything, despite the limited evidence in th…
• State v. Drowne, 436 So. 2d 916 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
  …ial court’s apparent revulsion to the officers’ forcing the front door of the home to remain open when the young child was attempting to close it. The trial court obviously believed it to be an unnecessary precipitate act. We find State v. Manning, 396 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), petition for review denied, 407 So. 2d 1104 (Fla.1981), to be factually distinguishable. In that case the officers had knocked. In Manning this court discussed the interests to be protected in applying the rule; and concluded th…
• State v. Schwartz, 398 So. 2d 460 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981)
  …safeguard the integrity and privacy of one’s home as well as to promote the safety of all concerned in situations where a police officer must “break open” some part of a dwelling in order to effectuate an arrest or serve a warrant. State v. Manning, 396 So. 2d 219 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981). See also, Benefield v. State, 160 So. 2d 706 (Fla.1964); Koptyra v. State, 172 So. 2d 628 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1965). Thus, Fourth Amendment privacy considerations are relevant in construing the knock and announce statute. Accordingl…

Authorities Cited

• Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980)
• Norwood K. Walton v. Walton, 290 So. 2d 110 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974)
• Schwartz v. Schwartz, 336 So. 2d 18 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976)