JAMES R. ROSE, APPELLANT,
v.
ROY H. BROWNLEE AND ROY H. UHLINGER, APPELLEES
JAMES R. ROSE, APPELLANT,
ROY H. BROWNLEE AND ROY H. UHLINGER, APPELLEES
2 F.2d 1013
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1924)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
By the concurring decisions of the three tribunals of the Patent Office, appellee's were awarded priority of invention over appellant Rose. The invention consists of heating gas to be used with oxygen in metal cutting and welding. Appellant is the junior party by over three years. This point, however, is of little importance, since the case turns upon the question of originality of invention. Only issues of fact are involved, and from an examination of the record we find no reason to disturb the findings of the various tribunals of the Patent Office. The decision of the Commissioner of Patents is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Application of Frey, 182 F.2d 184 (C.C.P.A. 1950)
-
Rauen v. Aiken, 74 F.2d 956 (C.C.P.A. 1935)
-
Smith v. Pritchard, 24 F.2d 274 (D.C. Cir. 1928)