F. J. HERMAN, APPELLANT,
v.
ARMSTRONG CORK & INSULATION COMPANY, ET AL., APPELLEES
F. J. HERMAN, APPELLANT,
ARMSTRONG CORK & INSULATION COMPANY, ET AL., APPELLEES
103 Fla. 148
Florida Supreme Court (1931)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 137 So. 688
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
A petition for rehearing having been granted in this cause and the Court having further considered the appeal upon the transcript of the record and briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, it is considered, ordered and decreed by the Court that the judgment of affirmance heretofore entered in this, cause should stand, whereupon it is ordered and decreed, by the Court that the decree of the Circuit Court appealed from herein be and the same is hereby reaffirmed.
Buford, C.J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Terrell, Brown and Davis, J.J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tyler v. Hill Bros., Inc., 127 Fla. 419 (Fla. 1937)…do not present facts parallel to the case at bar. The decree appealed from should be affirmed on authority of Smith v. Commercial Bank of Jasper, 77 Fla. 163, 81 Sou. 154; Johnson v. Allen, 22 Fla. 224; Commercial Credit Co. v. Davis, 103 Fla. 519, 137 Sou. 688, So ordered. Affirmed. Ellis, C. J., and Whitfield, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur. '…
-
Mavis Y. Norris v. Monroe Stewart, 350 So. 2d 31 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977)…2] Aviacion v. Boy, 180 So. 2d 503 (Fla.2nd DCA 1965). There was no showing by Mrs. Norris that Stewart’s intimations were illegal. See Smith v. Commercial Bank of Jasper, 77 Fla. 163, 81 So. 154 (1919); Commercial Credit Co. v. Davis, 103 Fla. 519, 137 So. 688 (1931); Tyler v. Hill Bros., 127 Fla. 419, 173 So. 147 (1937), and Corporación Peruana, supra. AFFIRMED. BOYER, Acting C. J., and MILLS and ERYIN, JJ., concur.…
-
Franklin v. Wallack, 576 So. 2d 1371 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)…f cases, that duress cannot be established by proof that a guilty person was threatened with criminal prosecution, where the threat has a connection with the demand for which compensation is sought.7 See Commercial Credit Co. v. Davis, 103 Fla. 519, 137 So. 688 (1931); Smith v. Commercial Bank of Jasper, 77 Fla. 163, 81 So. 154 (1919). Berber v. Berber, 466 So. 2d 1149 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) and Paris v. Paris, 412 So. 2d 952 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) cast some doubt on how strictly this rule is followed. But both…