JULIAN CAZENAVE, APPELLANT,
v.
UNITED STATES, APPELLEE; ANDREW BATTISTELLA, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE; WILLIAM STRUVE, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE; HENRY WALTERS, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE; JOHN BENINO, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE; VICTOR ADAMS, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE
JULIAN CAZENAVE, APPELLANT,
UNITED STATES, APPELLEE; ANDREW BATTISTELLA, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE; WILLIAM STRUVE, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE; HENRY WALTERS, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE; JOHN BENINO, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE; VICTOR ADAMS, APPELLANT, V. UNITED STATES, APPELLEE
3 F.2d 724
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1925)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion of the Court
The same questions arise in these eases as in the case of Denapolis v. United States (No. 4313) 3 F.(2d) 722, this day decided and aflirmed.
The decrees appealed from are therefore affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Seaboard Nat. Bank v. Rogers Milk Prods. Co., Inc., 21 F.2d 414 (2d Cir. 1927)
-
United States v. Cochrane, 87 F.2d 3 (5th Cir. 1936)
-
Mayer v. Chase Nat'l Bank OF the City OF NEW York under a certain agreement made on September 1, 233 F.2d 468 (2d Cir. 1956)
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Denapolis v. United States, 3 F.2d 722 (5th Cir. 1925)