W. T. CLARK AND LOUIS RONALDI, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
v.
UNITED STATES, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
W. T. CLARK AND LOUIS RONALDI, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,
UNITED STATES, DEFENDANT IN ERROR
4 F.2d 382
United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit (1925)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
1. The search of the automobile was not unauthorized. Stafford v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 300 F. 537; Moseley v. U. S. (C. C. A.) 4 F.(2d) 381, decided February 4, 1925.
2. The sufficiency of the evidence as against Ronaidi, and under the rule of Stafford v. U. S., supra, is challenged. The jury might well have thought it insufficient; but, considering the elements of improbability in Ronaldi’s story and conflicts between his story and that of Clark, we are not satisfied that there was error in submitting this issue to the jury.
The judgment is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Rouda v. United States, 10 F.2d 916 (2d Cir. 1926)
-
Wisniewski v. United States, 47 F.2d 825 (6th Cir. 1931)
-
Ramsey v. United States, 27 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1928)
Authorities Cited
- Moseley v. United States, 4 F.2d 381 (6th Cir. 1925)