SYDNEY ADLER, AS TRUSTEE, APPELLANT,

v.

SCOTT ELECTRIC COMPANY, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Dante Dino, Jr. v. State, 405 So. 2d 213 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981)
  …rd finding encompasses a finding of voluntariness is correct to the extent it means voluntariness on the insanity issue. This type of record finding is, in my view, exactly what is contemplated by the “unmistakable clarity” test. See Daizi v. State, 396 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981) (“unmistakable clarity” test satisfied by record indication that the trial court gave credence to testimony which showed voluntariness). But the problem here is that while the record demonstrates with unmistakable clarity that the…
• Waldemar Morales v. State, 456 So. 2d 548 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984)
  …PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Castor v. State, 365 So. 2d 701 (Fla.1978); Daizi v. State, 396 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981).…
• Daizi v. Fla. Parole & Prob. Comm'n, 436 So. 2d 171 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
  …la. 4th DCA 1983); Pannier v. Wainwright, 423 So. 2d 533 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) and Hardy v. Greadington, 405 So. 2d 768 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). We acknowledge that the Third District has ruled on the legality of petitioner’s sentences in Daizi v. State, 396 So. 2d 1160 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). The Florida Supreme Court’s opinion in State v. Gibson, 436 So. 2d 32 (Fla.1983), indicates that there is a question regarding the legality of the petitioner’s sentences. However, the question presented by this petition is not a…

Authorities Cited

• Troy v. State, 375 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979)