JOHN SANDERS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
JOHN SANDERS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
396 So. 2d 1192
Florida District Court of Appeal, Second District (1981)
Negative Treatment
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence of aggravated battery in violation of section 784.045, Florida Statutes (1979). In light of this court’s recent holding in Mc-Abee v. State, 391 So. 2d 373 (Fla.2d DCA 1980), appellant’s judgment and sentence for “attempted” resisting arrest with violence in violation of section 843.01, Florida Statutes (1979), is hereby vacated.
BOARDMAN, Acting C. J., and GRIMES and DANAHY, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Tinsley v. Tinsley, 490 So. 2d 205 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986)…CA 1970); see Maroun v. Maroun, 277 So. 2d 572 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). This statutory property obligation is distinct from any obligation which may result from the trial court’s final judgment grant ing dissolution of the marriage. See Spikes v. Spikes, 396 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). It is impermissible, therefore, to require one spouse, by his payments on the house, to increase the equity of the other spouse. Kohn v. Kohn, 423 So. 2d 575 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Rubino v. Rubino, 372 So. 2d 539 (Fla. 1st DCA 197…
-
Bailey v. Parker, 492 So. 2d 1175 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)…egard to the accounting between the parties. First, the law is clear that it is the obligation of each tenant in common to pay one half of all property expenses, including mortgage payments, taxes, insurance, and necessary repairs. Spikes v. Spikes, 396 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), except when a cotenant has sole possession of the property and is receiving all the profits therefrom. 12 Fla.Jur.2d, Cotenancy and Partition, § 28. Assuming the trial court relied on Mrs. Bailey’s testimony regarding the amount…
-
Nate Trachsel v. S.C.K.W., Inc., 555 So. 2d 1293 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…rts, however, that he is not obliged to make any contribution toward the expenses of maintaining the common area. We entirely agree with the trial court’s conclusion to the contrary and affirm the judgment in S.C.K.W.’s favor. See Spikes v. Spikes, 396 So. 2d 1192 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981); Mintz v. Ellison, 233 So. 2d 156, 157 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970). We also conclude that there is substantial competent evidence in the record to support the amount awarded. Affirmed. * The remainder of the manager's salary, and other…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- McABEE v. State, 391 So. 2d 373 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980)