NORTH RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR; PHŒNIX INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR; ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR; UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR; NIAGARA FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR; ST. PAUL FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR; AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR; GENERAL FIRE ASSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR; STERLING FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR; AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, V. WILSON & TOOMER FERTILIZER COMPANY, DEFENDANT IN ERROR

5th Cir. | 1925-03-21
Nos. 4353-4362
5 F.2d 1019 Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (1925) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case

Opinion of the Court
BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

BRYAN, Circuit Judge.

It was stipulated ,by counsel that the above eases should abide the result of the writ of error in Hartford Fire Insurance Company v. Wilson & Toomer Fertilizer Company (No. 4352) 4 F.(2d) 835, this day decided and affirmed. Accordingly the judgments herein are affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw