FREDDIE O. HADLEY, APPELLANT,

v.

SCHOOL BOARD OF LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Wilson, 483 So. 2d 23 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
  …njury to the mother by hiring Haynes to commit the murder. To prove respondents’ guilt, the state would have to prove that Haynes committed the murder as a consequence of the counsel, procurement, or instigation of respondents. See Coxwell v. State, 397 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). As we read Potts, because Haynes’ judgment of acquittal is not relevant to respondents’ case, it is not admissible at their trial. As such, we hold that it was error for the trial court to rule that such evidence was admissible.…
• Fuller v. State, 414 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
  …taken place, the proper jury instructions are restricted to all degrees of murder, manslaughter, and justifiable and excusable homicide. Brown v. State, 245 So. 2d 68 (Fla.1971); Martin v. State, 342 So. 2d 501 (Fla.1977); Compare, Coxwell v. State, 397 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). See and compare: Alicea v. State, 392 So. 2d 960 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980).2 As to the second point, we vacate the sentence upon the conviction for displaying of a firearm during the commission of a felony upon the reasoning of the S…
• State v. Jacques Simone, 431 So. 2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983)
  …So. 2d at 502-03. The rule is apparently well established in Florida. See, e.g., State v. Thomas, 362 So. 2d 1348, 1350 n. 6 (Fla.1978); Lewis v. State, 377 So. 2d 640 (Fla.1979); Fuller v. State, 414 So. 2d 264 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Coxwell v. State, 397 So. 2d 335 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981); Henderson v. State, 370 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979). It should be noted, however, that application of the Martin rule in this case leads inevitably to a conflict with the Brown I jury instruction requirements as expressed in…

Authorities Cited

• Blanchette v. Sch. Bd. OF Leon Cnty., 378 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979)