LAKE HIGHLAND NURSING HOME AND R. P. HEWITT & ASSOCIATES OF FLORIDA, INC., APPELLANTS,
v.
ELNORA EVERETT, APPELLEE

Fla. 1st DCA | 1981-04-21
No. WW-317
BOOTH and JOANOS, JJ., and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.
397 So. 2d 380 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1981)

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The court held that the award of temporary total disability benefits was supported by evidence, but the order needed amendment for clarity and statutory compliance.


Facts & Procedural History

The Employer/Carrier appealed a workers' compensation order awarding claimant temporary total disability benefits and remedial treatment. The order co…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

The Employer/Carrier appeal a workers’ compensation order which awarded claimant temporary total disability benefits. We find that the award of temporary total disability benefits is supported by substantial competent evidence.

Paragraph one of the decretal portion of the deputy’s order erroneously provides for payment of temporary total disability benefits until claimant shall have reached maximum medical improvement or shall have returned to gainful employment. There is no automatic relationship between temporary total disability and the achievement of maximum medical improvement, or the return to work by the injured party. National Airlines v. Rowley, 9 FCR 262 (1975); Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Hill, IRC Order 2-3645 (1979). Therefore, this portion of the order is hereby amended to confine payment of temporary total disability benefits to the actual period of temporary total disability.

Paragraph two of the decretal portion of the deputy’s order erroneously overlooks the time limitations of Section 440.-13(3)(b), Florida Statutes (1977) in its award of remedial treatment. This portion of the order is amended as follows:

The employer/carrier shall provide to the claimant such care and treatment as the nature of her injury or the process of her recovery may require, under a qualified psychiatrist in the Lake County area who is mutually agreeable to the claimant and the employer/carrier, in the manner and for the time provided by law.

Luv Auto Sales, Inc. v. Murphy, IRC Order 2-3567 (1978), cert. dismissed 373 So. 2d 459 (Fla.1979).

As amended, the order is affirmed.

BOOTH and JOANOS, JJ., and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw