IN RE LANSLEY. PETITION OF LEWIS
IN RE LANSLEY. PETITION OF LEWIS
7 F.2d 888
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (1925)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
We agree with the court-below that, since there was no property bathe custody of the court affected by the apparent legal title outstanding in. Smith,, service- of the show -cause order in New Jersey gave no jurisdiction to the court for the Eastern district of New York. Remington (3d Ed.) § 34, vol. 1, p. 64 et seq.
The proper practice would have been to-apply for ancillary summary process in the-New Jersey district. Babbitt v. Dutcher, 216 U. S. 102, 30 S. Ct. 372, 54 L. Ed. 402,. 17 Ann. Cas. 969.
Order affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Lansley. Petition of Lewis, 15 F.2d 471 (2d Cir. 1926)
-
In re Miller v. Klein, 95 F.2d 441 (7th Cir. 1938)
Authorities Cited
- Babbitt in Bankruptcy v. Dutcher, 216 U.S. 102 (U.S. 1910)