STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, PETITIONER,

v.

JOHN DAVID JONES, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE COMPANY AND LEWIS P. BARWICK, RESPONDENTS

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Gray, 435 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 1983)
  …cused: (1) knew the threatened person was to be called as a witness in some judicial proceeding and (2) [*819] intended that the threat influence the witness to withhold testimony or testify falser !y- The district court noted that in Lee v. State, 397 So. 2d 684 (Fla.1981), this- Court held that section 918.14(3)(a)l was suffi-. ciently clear to provide a definite warning of the conduct proscribed, measured by' common understanding and practice. The district court accordingly acknowledged, that it was bound…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Gray v. State, 404 So. 2d 388 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981)
  …egislative branch of government and disregards the court’s duty to measure statutes against constitutional standards. Without discussing the elements of this offense or mentioning Murray, the Florida Supreme Court in the recent case of Lee v. State, 397 So. 2d 684 (Fla. 1981), has held this statute constitutional on the basis that it is sufficiently definite to convey a definite warning as to the conduct proscribed, measured by common understanding and practice. We are, of course, bound by that decision. Art…

Authorities Cited

• Fla. Farm Bureau Ins. Co. v. Gov't Emps. Ins. Co., 387 So. 2d 932 (Fla. 1980)
• Jones v. Barwick, 386 So. 2d 7 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)