WILLIAM NOIRMOT, J. OLSEN, PEDER HANSEN, J. WINDEHL AND M. DERRANE, APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES,
v.
SCHOONER ROSEMARY, CHARLES J. DENECHAND, OWNER, AND W. N. BURBIDGE, MASTER, APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS
WILLIAM NOIRMOT, J. OLSEN, PEDER HANSEN, J. WINDEHL AND M. DERRANE, APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES,
SCHOONER ROSEMARY, CHARLES J. DENECHAND, OWNER, AND W. N. BURBIDGE, MASTER, APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS
9 F.2d 982
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1925)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
We have considered the testimony and the oral and printed arguments. We are satisfied that the amount awarded by the deeree helow to the libelant Noirmot is ample to cover all claims he has against the respondents or either of them. We are not prepared to say it is excessive. We believe that the learned court below was right in holding that the other libelants had failed to establish any ground for recovery.
Affirmed.