THE FLORIDA BAR. IN RE PETITIONER OF EDWARD W. STARR FOR REINSTATEMENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Edward W. Starr is reinstated to the active practice of law subject to conditions.
Edward W. Starr, a suspended member of The Florida Bar, petitioned for reinstatement. A referee recommended reinstatement subject to conditions, and T…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before the Court upon the petition of Edward W. Starr, a suspended member of The Florida Bar, for reinstatement to the active practice of law. See Art. V, § 15, Fla.Const.; Fla.Bar Integr. Rule, .art. XI, Rule 11.11.
Mr. Starr was suspended by order of this Court on April 5, 1978. The Florida Bar v. Starr, 357 So. 2d 730 (Fla.1978). We are in receipt of the report of the referee containing findings of fact and recommending that Mr. Starr be reinstated subject to certain conditions. The Florida Bar has not filed a petition for review. We therefore adopt the referee’s findings of fact and approve his recommendations.
We hereby reinstate Edward W. Starr to the active practice of law, subject to the condition that for the next three years he and his accountant shall, on or before April 1 of each year, file with the executive director of The Florida Bar a statement that Mr. Starr has properly filed his income tax return for the previous year. We also assess the costs of this reinstatement proceeding against Mr. Starr. It is so ordered.
BOYD, Acting C. J., and OVERTON, ENGLAND, ALDERMAN and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
State v. Div. OF Bond Fin., 495 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 1986)…, we conclude that DBF may issue these taxable bonds. The trial court also'found that the bonds will serve a public purpose by providing mortgages for low, moderate, and middle income persons at reasonable rates. Compare State v. City of Pensacola, 397 So. 2d 922 (Fla.1981) (projects promoting decent housing serve a public purpose); State v. Housing Finance Authority, 376 So. 2d 1158 (Fla.1979) (projects alleviating a shortage of affordable housing and making capital available for investment in housing serve…
-
State v. Hous. Fin. Auth. OF Pinellas Cnty., 506 So. 2d 397 (Fla. 1987)…0 per year were shown to be in greatest need, we do not interpret his comments as clearly indicative of more. Providing housing for moderate, middle, and lesser income households without question serves a public purpose. State v. City of Pensacola, 397 So. 2d 922 (Fla.1981); State v. Housing Finance Authority, 376 So. 2d 1158 (Fla.1979). Pursuant to section 159.602, Florida Statutes (1985), the Florida Legislature has specifically found a shortage of affordable housing and capital for investment in such hous…
Authorities Cited
- THE Florida BAR v. Starr, 357 So. 2d 730 (Fla. 1978)