DENNIS H. CRONIN, U. S. MARSHAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
FRED TOTORO, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. E. E. MCVICKER, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. CHARLIE MITCHELL, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. ELMER E. MACNALLEY, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. ALFIO ROBINO, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. JOHN SURRA, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. ALBERT WESTON, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. SAM CATINA, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. TONY CANTONI, APPELLEE
DENNIS H. CRONIN, U. S. MARSHAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
FRED TOTORO, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. E. E. MCVICKER, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. CHARLIE MITCHELL, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. ELMER E. MACNALLEY, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. ALFIO ROBINO, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. JOHN SURRA, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. ALBERT WESTON, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. SAM CATINA, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. TONY CANTONI, APPELLEE
11 F.2d 140
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (1926)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
The decision of this court in No. 6921, Dennis H. Cronin, United States Marshal for the District of Nebraska et al. v. William J. Fox, 11 F.(2d) 139 (opinion this day filed) is determinative of the questions involved in each of these eases. The order in each ease sustaining the application for writ of habeas corpus and discharging the prisoner from custody and imprisonment is reversed, and each cause is remanded to the District Court, with instructions to vacate the order in each case sustaining the writ, discharge the same, and remand the prisoner to the custody of the appellants or their successors in office.
Reversed and remanded. •
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kroska v. United States, 51 F.2d 330 (8th Cir. 1931)
-
Durkin v. United States, 62 F.2d 305 (1st Cir. 1932)
Authorities Cited
- Cronin v. FOX, 11 F.2d 139 (8th Cir. 1926)