DENNIS H. CRONIN, U. S. MARSHAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
v.
FLORENCE GODLY, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. JAMES DOLEZAL, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. JOHN FENEZIA, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. GUS A. FAGERBERG, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. CHARLES MARINO, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. MARY PIERCE, APPELLEE
DENNIS H. CRONIN, U. S. MARSHAL FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA, ET AL., APPELLANTS,
FLORENCE GODLY, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. JAMES DOLEZAL, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. JOHN FENEZIA, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. GUS A. FAGERBERG, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. CHARLES MARINO, APPELLEE; SAME, APPELLANTS, V. MARY PIERCE, APPELLEE
11 F.2d 140
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (1926)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Each of these cases involves substantially the same question determined in No. 6921, Dennis H. Cronin, United States Marshal for the District of Nebraska, et al., v. William J. Fox, 11 F.(2d) 139 (opinion this day filed). They were submitted to this court on appeal under a stipulation to abide the decision in No. 6921. The judgment and order in each of these eases sustaining the application for writ of habeas corpus and discharging the prisoner from custody and imprisonment is reversed, and the cases are remanded to the District Court for such further proceedings as suggested in th opinion in No. 6921, Cronin et al. v. William J. Fox, 11 F.(2d) 139.
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Kroska v. United States, 51 F.2d 330 (8th Cir. 1931)
-
Durkin v. United States, 62 F.2d 305 (1st Cir. 1932)
Authorities Cited
- Cronin v. FOX, 11 F.2d 139 (8th Cir. 1926)