SYDNEY ROBINSON

v.

EDITH COPELAND, JOINED BY HER HUSBAND, J. S. COPELAND, AND JESSE ROBINSON

Citator

Cited By

• Roslyn S. Finston v. Finston, 160 Fla. 935 (Fla. 1948)
  …r is here for review under Rule 34 of the Rules of this Court. The primary point for determination is whether or not the property rights which respondent seeks to bring in issue in this case were adjudicated in Finston v. Finston, 34 So. (2nd) 745, 160 Fla. 343. [*937] We think this question requires an affirmative answer. The rule seems well settled that a final decree in a equity suit settles all property rights of the parties and bars any action thereafter brought by either party to determine the questi…
• Wise v. Wise, 834 So. 2d 887 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)
  …ing the former wife’s motion to revisit the parties’ equitable distribution scheme on the basis of Davis and Finston. In Finston, the final judgment of dissolution was affirmed by the Florida Supreme Court on March 30, 1948. See Finston v. Finston, 160 Fla. 343, 34 So. 2d 745 (1948). In August 1948, the former husband petitioned the trial court for a supplementary final decree which would have required the former wife to release or waive her rights to certain property. The trial court denied the former wif…

Authorities Cited

• Whitehurst v. State, 160 Fla. 339 (Fla. 1948)