CHARLES C. SCALIONE, APPELLANT,
v.
CARL BOSCH, APPELLEE

D.C. Cir. | 1926-04-05
No. 1825
12 F.2d 172 United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (1926)

Opinion of the Court
ROBB, J. Associate Justice.

ROBB, J. Associate Justice.

This interfer-

ence involves the same applications of the parties Scalione and Bosch that were involved in the prior interference, patent appeal No. 1824, — App. D. C. — , 12 F.(2d) 171, just decided, and the same contentions are made. It follows that the rulings made in that case are controlling here, and accordingly the decision is affirmed.

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw