MARSHALL EARL WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
MARSHALL EARL WILLIAMS, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
397 So. 2d 1185
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fifth District (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence for robbery with a firearm. The Public Defender has filed an Anders
motion and brief requesting leave to withdraw as counsel for appellant and representing to this court that no reversible error appears. On October 16, 1980, this court gave appellant thirty (30) days within which to file a brief in his own behalf. No such brief has been filed. The court has reviewed counsel’s brief and the record herein and no reversible error appears. The motion of the Public Defender to withdraw is hereby granted and the judgment and sentence is hereby AFFIRMED.
DAUKSCH, C. J., and ORFINGER and FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., JJ., concur. . Anders v. California. 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dep't of Hwy. Safety & Motor Vehicles v. Corbin, 527 So. 2d 868 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)…. 2d 731 (Fla.1978); Broward County Classroom Teachers Ass’n, Inc. v. Public Emp. Relations Commission, 331 So. 2d 342 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976), cert. den., 341 So. 2d 1080 (Fla.1976); and National Advanced Systems Corp. v. School Board of Orange County, 397 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). We therefore affirm PERC’s order to the extent that it is based on its duty to apply Model Rule 28-5.304, Florida Administrative Code. We note that the agency has not challenged the validity of Model Rule 28-5.304, either below…
-
Woodard v. Fla. State Univ., 518 So. 2d 336 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)…g in this case because the University had not yet adopted a specific rule of procedure concerning the method of requesting a hearing for parties adversely affected by its actions. See National Advanced Systems Corp. v. School Board of Orange County, 397 So. 2d 1185 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). Similarly, section 20.8 of the UFF/BOR Agreement, which outlines contractual grievance procedures, provides: All grievances shall be filed ... within twenty-five (25) days following the act or omission giving rise thereto, or t…
Authorities Cited
- Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (U.S. 1967)