ROBERT STEVE BRYAN, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ROBERT STEVE BRYAN, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
397 So. 2d 1235
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1981)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant appeals his conviction for sale or delivery of cannabis raising as his sole point on appeal the trial court’s alleged error in refusing to instruct the jury on the maximum and minimum penalties as required by Tascano v. State, 393 So. 2d 540 (Fla.1980), rehearing denied February 27, 1981. Appellant’s argument is clearly frivolous since the jury was instructed as required by Tascano, supra. (T-843-846). AFFIRMED.
SHAW, WENTWORTH and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Sandor Suto v. State, 422 So. 2d 924 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982)…y in case 79-2455 was in excess of the maximum authorized by law. Issues which were or could have been raised on a direct appeal are not cognizable grounds for relief under rule 3.850. Hargrave v. State, 396 So. 2d 1127 (Fla.1981); Owens v. State, 397 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). Grounds (1) and (2) of Suto’s motion could have been raised on direct appeal. Suto’s claim directed to his sentence for burglary in case 79-2455 is wholly without merit. The body of the information filed in said case indicates th…
-
Taylor v. State, 407 So. 2d 356 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981)…a Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Issues which were or could have been raised on a direct appeal are not cognizable grounds for relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Hargrave v. State, 396 So. 2d 1127 (Fla.1981); Owens v. State, 397 So. 2d 1235 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981). Although appellant makes a bald assertion of ineffective assistance of counsel, he does not provide this court with the specific facts necessary to support such an [*357] assertion as required by Knight v. State, 394 So. 2d 997…
Authorities Cited
- Tascano v. State, 393 So. 2d 540 (Fla. 1980)